Historical preconditions for the formation of a quality control system for forensic examinations

Introduction. The problem of the quality of forensic examinations has existed throughout the history of forensic medicine, which determines the relevance of quality control of examinations.

The purpose of the work was to evaluate and analyze, from a historical perspective, the literature and the provisions of regulatory documents on quality control of forensic examinations, the definition of defects and their prevention at all stages of forensic examination.

Materials and methods. A literature search on the subject was performed in the PubMed, ResearchGate, and Elibrary databases. The depth of the search is 151 years. Fifty-six sources were included in the review.

Results and discussion. For the first time the right of a forensic physician to err was recognized in the 19th century, doctors were prosecuted for mistakes. Expert errors are relevant nowadays, the conclusions of experts are not satisfied by courts, investigation and prosecutor’s office. The significance of quality control of expert examinations at the state level was determined in 1951. The first measures to improve expert examinations were adopted in 1962. In 1978, provisions were formulated for the execution of the expert report, the possibility of a dubious conclusion was pointed out. In 1991, the requirements for the execution of documents were outlined. In 2003 a procedure for organizing repeated commission expert examonations after poor-quality primary ones was presented. Currently, however, the regulatory documents lack criteria for defective examinations and measures to prevent defects. In the Russian Federation in 2019 a plan of measures to improve the production of expert examinations is approved, which determines the relevance of studying the issues of organization of quality control of expert examinations and prevention of expert errors.

Conclusion. Since the establishment of the State Bureau of Forensic Medicine in the Russian Federation, criteria for the quality of forensic examination based on the identification of defects in the work of a forensic doctor have been developed and used. The formation of successive stages of control based on unified criteria for evaluating the expert work will allow to draw an objective conclusion about the quality of forensic examination.

1. Naumov ES, Lomov VE, Zaslavsky GI. On the state of budget financing of state forensic medical institutions of the North-West Federal District. Scientific notes of I.P. Pavlov St. Petersburg State Medical University. 2011;18(1):25−30. (In Russ.).

2. Barinov EH, Romodanovsky PO. Control of order of production of forensic medical examinations – the important stage of rising of their quality. Problems of expertise in medicine = Problemy jekspertizy v medicine. 2014;2−3(54−55):7−11. (In Russ.).

3. Solodun Y.V. Requirements of sufficiency of the conclusion of forensic-medical examination in criminal proceedings. Forensic medicine: issues, problems, expert practice = Sudebnaja medicina: voprosy, problemy, jekspertnaja praktika. 2016;1(22):43−46. (In Russ.).

4. Freiberg N.G. Medical and Sanitary Legislation in Russia: ed. 2nd edition, revised and enlarged. SPb ; 1908. 25 с. (In Russ.).

5. Nazarov VY. Formation of the city forensic medical expert service of St. Petersburg. D. thesis. D. in medical sciences. Moscow. 2009. 42 p. (In Russ.).

6. Butovsky DI, Isaeva LM, Kildyushov EM et al. Historical aspects of the participation of a forensic doctor in the examination of a corpse at the place of its discovery. Medical expertise and law = Medicinskaja jekspertiza i pravo. 2013;1:49−55. (In Russ.).

7. Lyalina EA. Complex assessment of defects of medical records on the quality of forensic medical examinations. Autoref. dissertation. D. in medical sciences. Novosibirsk. 2010. 23 p. (In Russ.).

8. Samoilichenko A.N. Analytical review of the state of forensic medical examination in cases of sexual crimes in the Russian Federation. Actual problems of forensic-medical expertise. Collection of abstracts of scientific-practical conference with international participation. Moscow. 2012. pp. 38−43. (In Russ.).

9. Tenkov A.A. Mistakes of forensic experts and ways to prevent them. Practical guide in three volumes. Kursk : Publishing house of KSMU; 2012−2014. 1646 p. (In Russ.).

10. Klevno VA. The notion and classification of expert malpractice. Forensic medical expertise = Sudebno-medicinskaja jekspertiza. 2012;55(2):36−38. (In Russ.).

11. Pavlova EV. Typical shortcomings of preliminary investigation at appointment and production of judicial examinations. Legality = Zakonnost’. 2017;9(995):21−26. (In Russ.).

12. Kamchatov KV. Problems of the order of forensic examinations: a view of prosecutors. Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference with international participation “Milestones of History of Russian Center of forensic-medical expertise. To the 90th Anniversary from the Day of its Formation”. Moscow ; 2021. Val. 1. pp. 242−250. (In Russ.).

13. Dontsov VG. Proportional influence of elements of the system of intensive functioning of the forensic medical service in the region on the final results. Sovremennye voprosy dermatovenerologii: jubilee collection of scientific works. Kursk ; 1993. pp. 58−59. (In Russ.).

14. Dontsov V.G. Mechanism of differential labor payment in conditions of intensification of medical activity. Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health, and History of Medicine. 1994;2:41−44. (In Russ.).

15. Dontzov VG. Approaches to the formation of modern technologies of expertise and regulation of the expert process. Forensic medical expertise = Sudebno-medicinskaja jekspertiza. 1995;2:27−29. (In Russ.).

16. Dontzov VG. Technological algorithms − a universal tool of the system of intensive functioning of the regional forensic service. Forensic medical expertise = Sudebno-medicinskaja jekspertiza. 1995;4:31−33. (In Russ.).

17. Kildyushov EM, Erofeev SV. Implementation of effective contract and stimulating systems of labor remuneration in the Russian Forensic Medical Bureau. Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference with International Participation “History of Russian Center of forensic-medical expertise in persons and facts, to the 85-th anniversary since the establishment”. Moscow ; 2016. Val. 1. pp. 116−122. (In Russ.).

18. Dontsov VG. Development and substantiation of directions for improving the forensic medical service of the region in modern socio-economic conditions. Autoref. dissertation. D. in medical sciences. Moscow. 1995. 32 p. (In Russ.).

19. Dontzov VG. Development and substantiation of the main directions of perfection of the forensic medical service of the region in modern socio-economic conditions: D. Sci. D. in medical sciences. Moscow. 1995. pp. 127−164. (In Russ.).

20. Kovalev AV, Loban IV. Management of state forensic activity in russia as a scientific problem: brief historical analysis and research prospects. Forensic medical expertise = Sudebno-medicinskaja jekspertiza. 2018;61(5):4−13. (In Russ.).

21. Sergeev AV, Plyukhin SV. Three-stage internal control of the quality of medical care in the Republican Bureau of Forensic Medicine, Ministry of Health of the Chuvash Republic. Current issues of forensic medical examination of newborns and children. Proceedings of the Scientific-Practical Conference on the 65th Anniversary of the Education at the “Republican Bureau of forensic-medical examination of the Ministry of Health of the Chuvash Republic”. Cheboksary. 2019. pp. 60−69. (In Russ.).

22. Kolkutin VV, Naumov ES, Lomov VE et al. On the state of budget financing of state forensic medical institutions of the Russian Federation. Forensic medical expertise = Sudebno-medicinskaja jekspertiza. 2011;6:46−51. (In Russ.).

23. Roberts ISD, Benamore RE, Peebles C et al. Technical report: diagnosis of coronary artery disease using a minimally invasive autopsy: evaluation of a novel method of post-mortem coronary CT angiography. Clin Radiol. 2011;66(7): 645−650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2011.01.007.

24. Sarwar S, Shafi M. National confidential enquiry into patient outcome and death. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine. 2007;17:278−279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2007.07.006.

25. Smith J. The Shipman Inquiry. Third report — death certification and the investigation of deaths by coroners. Crown Copyright. 2003. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-shipman-inquiry-third-report-deathcertification-and-the-investigation-of-deaths-by-coroners.

26. The Report of the Royal Liverpool Children’s Inquiry. 2001. URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/250934/0012_ii.pdf

27. Human Tissue Act. 2004. 12. Human Tissue Authority URL: www.hta.gov.uk

28. Makarov IY, Kuprina TA, Fetisov VA et al. The coroner’s autopsies in the Great Britain: the problems related to the quality of the studies, standardization, auditing, financial support and the approaches to their solution. Forensic medical expertise = Sudebno-medicinskaja jekspertiza. 2018;3:54−59. (In Russ.).

29. Loban IE, Isakov VD, Lavrentyuk GP. Internal quality control of forensic medical activity. Materials of the extended scientificpractical conference “Forensic-medical expertise of St. Petersburg XX−XXI centuries: traditions, integration of scientific knowledge and technologies, professional ethics” (September 21−22, 2018). S-Pb. 2018. pp. 32−41. (In Russ.).

30. Kislov MA, Krupin KN. The need for implementation of the internal quality control system in the state forensic expert institutions. Bulletin of the Medical Institute REAVIZ: Rehabilitation, Doctor and Health = Vestnik medicinskogo instituta REAVIZ: reabilitacija, vrach i zdorov’e. 2017;2(26):119−123. (In Russ.).

31. Solodun YV. Forensic examination of a corpse and assessment of the conclusion during a judicial investigation. Proceedings of the VIII All-Russian Congress of forensic medicine with international participation “Achievements of Russian forensic science of XX−XXI centuries: to the centenary of modern forensic schools”. Moscow. 2018. Vol. 1. pp. 99−101. (In Russ.).