Experimental Study of the Corrosive and Biocompatible Properties of Bioresorbable Mg-Ca-Zn Alloy Implants
https://doi.org/10.52420/2071-5943-2024-23-1-77-89
EDN: LEVZFV
Abstract
Introduction. Magnesium and its alloys are used as biodegradable bone implants due to their high biocompatibility, however, the problem of use is rapid biodegradation with loss of strength.
The purpose of the study. Experimental evaluation of bioresorbable Mg-Ca-Zn alloy implants in vitro and in bone tissue in vivo, in order to determine the optimal rate of biodegradation, biocompatibility and reparative response of bone tissue.
Materials and methods. Samples from the obtained Mg-Ca-Zn alloy were coated in a microarc oxidation bath (MDO), and to further determine the optimal phase composition and surface properties, the samples were kept in an electrolyte. The biodegradation of implants was assessed by the loss of mass of samples in vitro, and the release of gas into bone tissue in vivo, and the biocompatibility and reparative response of bone tissue density.
Results. All Mg-Ca-Zn coated samples show reduced weight loss compared to the uncoated sample. Magnesium samples with a 20-minute exposure in electrolyte, in the context of its application in anatomically unloaded areas, showed the optimal rate of biodegradation, biocompatibility and reparative response of bone tissue.
Discussion. In our study using the microarc oxidation for control the corrosion resistance samples of magnesium alloy shows good biocompatibility and low corrosion rate. We found 5-fold increase in corrosion resistance in coated implants, compared with uncoated samples.
Сonclusion. The results of an experimental evaluation of bioresorbable Mg-Ca-Zn alloy implants in vitro and in bone tissue in vivo showed that Mg-Ca-Zn coated samples demonstrate low weight loss during biodegradation, with minimal gas release into the bone.
Keywords
About the Authors
I. I. GordienkoRussian Federation
Ivan I. Gordienko — Candidate of Sciences (Medicine), Associate Professor, Vice-Rector for Research and Innovations, Associate Professor of the Department of Pediatric Surgery
Ekaterinburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflict of interest.
E. S. Marchenko
Russian Federation
Ekaterina S. Marchenko — Doctor of Sciences (Physics and Mathematics), Associate Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Superelastic Biointerfaces
Tomsk
Competing Interests:
The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflict of interest.
S. A. Borisov
Russian Federation
Semen A. Borisov — Assistant of the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Head of the Laboratory of New Bioequivalent and Bioresorbable Osteoplastic Materials for Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery
Ekaterinburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflict of interest.
S. P. Chernyy
Russian Federation
Stepan P. Chernyy — Laboratory Technician-Researcher of the Laboratory of New Bioequivalent and Bioresorbable Osteoplastic Materials for Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, Postgraduate Student of the Department of Pediatric Surgery
Ekaterinburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflict of interest.
N. A. Tsap
Russian Federation
Natalia A. Tsap — Doctor of Sciences (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Department of Pediatric Surgery
Ekaterinburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflict of interest.
A. A. Shishelova
Russian Federation
Arina A. Shishelova — Research Engineer of the Laboratory of Superelastic Biointerfaces
Tomsk
Competing Interests:
The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflict of interest.
A. P. Khrustalev
Russian Federation
Anton P. Khrustalev — Candidate of Sciences (Physics and Mathematics), Head of the Laboratory of Multilevel Dynamic Analysis of Materials and Structures
Tomsk
Competing Interests:
The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflict of interest.
P. I. Butyagin
Russian Federation
Pavel I. Butyagin — Candidate of Sciences (Chemistry), Chemical Technologist Engineer, Senior Researcher of the Laboratory of Superelastic Biointerfaces
Tomsk
Competing Interests:
The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflict of interest.
S. S. Arbuzova
Russian Federation
Svetlana S. Arbuzova — Candidate of Sciences (Chemistry), Researcher of the Laboratory of Superelastic Biointerfaces
Tomsk
Competing Interests:
The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Zheng, YF, Gu, XN, Witte F. Biodegradable metals. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports. 2014;77:1– 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2014.01.001.
2. Antoniac I, Miculescu M, Mănescu Păltânea V, Stere A, Quan PH, Păltânea G, et al. Magnesium-based alloys used in orthopedic surgery. Materials. 2022;15(3):1148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15031148.
3. Xu C, Nakata T, Fan GH, Li XW, Tang GZ, Kamado S. Enhancing strength and creep resistance of Mg-Gd- Y-Zn-Zr alloy by substituting Mn for Zr. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys. 2019;7:388–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2019.04.007.
4. Pan H, Qin G, Huang Y, Ren Y, Sha X, Han X, et al. Development of low-alloyed and rareearth-free magnesium alloys having ultra-high strength. Acta Materialia. 2018;149:350–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.002.
5. Malik A, Yangwei W, Huanwu C, Nazeer F, Khan MA, Mingjun W. Microstructural evolution of ultra-fine grained Mg-6.62Zn-0.6Zr alloy on the basis of adiabatic rise in temperature under dynamic loading. Vacuum. 2019;168:108810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2019.108810.
6. Yu Z, Xu C, Meng J, Kamado S. Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of a high strength Mg-11.7Gd-4.9Y-0.3Zr (wt %) alloy prepared by pre-deformation annealing, hot extrusion and ageing. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2017;703:348–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.06.096.
7. Song J, She J, Chen D, Pan F. Latest research advances on magnesium and magnesium alloys worldwide. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys. 2020;8(1):1–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2020.02.003.
8. Tie D, Liu H, Guan R, Holt-Torres P, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. In vivo assessment of biodegradable magnesium alloy ureteral stents in a pig model. Acta Biomaterialia. 2020;116:415–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.023.
9. Lu Y, Deshmukh S, Jones I, Chiu YL. Biodegradable magnesium alloys for orthopaedic applications. Biomaterials Translational. 2021;2(3):214–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12336/biomatertransl.2021.03.005.
10. Kraus T, Fischerauer SF, Hänzi AC, Uggowitzer PJ, Löffler JF, Weinberg AM. Magnesium alloys for temporary implants in osteosynthesis: In vivo studies of their degradation and interaction with bone. Acta Biomaterialia. 2012;8(3):1230–1238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.008.
11. Amukarimi S, Mozafari M. Biodegradable magnesium-based biomaterials: An overview of challenges and opportunities. MedComm. 2021;2(2):123–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.59.
12. Stürznickel J, Delsmann MM, Jungesblut OD, Stücker R, Knorr C, Rolvien T, et al. Magnesium-based biodegradable implants in children and adolescents. Injury. 2022;53(6):2382–2383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.02.037.
13. Chen S, Wan P, Zhang B, Yang K, Li Y. Facile fabrication of the zoledronate-incorporated coating on magnesium alloy for orthopaedic implants. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation. 2020;22:2–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2019.09.007.
14. Söntgen S, Keilig L, Kabir K, Weber A, Reimann S, Welle K, et al. Mechanical and numerical investigations of biodegradable magnesium alloy screws for fracture treatment. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2023;111(1):7–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35127.
15. Dai Y, Guo H, Chu L, He Z, Wang M, Zhang S, et al. Promoting osteoblasts responses in vitro and improving osteointegration in vivo through bioactive coating of nanosilicon nitride on polyetheretherketone. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation. 2020;24:198–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2019.10.011.
16. Baigonakova G, Marchenko E, Zhukov I, Vorozhtsov A. Structure, cytocompatibility and biodegradation of nanocrystalline coated Mg-Ca-Zn alloys. Vacuum. 2023;207:111630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.111630.
17. Khrustalyov A, Monogenov A, Baigonakova G, Akhmadieva A, Marchenko E, Vorozhtsov A. Effect of TiN coating on the structure, mechanical properties and fracture of the Mg-Ca-Zn alloy. Metals. 2022;12 (12):2140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/met12122140.
18. Li L, Li T, Zhang Z, Chen Z, Chen C, Chen F. Superhydrophobic graphene/hydrophobic polymer coating on a microarc oxidized metal surface. Journal of Coatings Technology and Research. 2022;19:1449–1456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-022-00618-w.
19. Yao W, Wu L, Wang J, Jiang B, Zhang D, Serdechnova M, et al. Micro‐arc oxidation of magnesium alloys: A review. Journal of Materials Science & Technology. 2022;118:158–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.11.053.
20. Yuan B, Chen H, Zhao R, Deng X, Chen G, Yang X, et al. Construction of a magnesium hydroxide/graphene oxide/hydroxyapatite composite coating on Mg-Ca-Zn-Ag alloy to inhibit bacterial infection and promote bone regeneration. Bioactive Materials. 2022;18:354–367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.02.030.
21. Kamrani S, Fleck C. Biodegradable magnesium alloys as temporary orthopaedic implants: A review. BioMetals. 2019;32:185–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-019-00170-y.
22. Rout PK, Roy S, Ganguly S, Rathore DK. A review on properties of magnesium-based alloys for biomedical applications. Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express. 2022;8(4):22–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2057–1976/ac6d81.
23. Agarwal S, Curtin J, Duffy B, Jaiswal S. Biodegradable magnesium alloys for orthopaedic applications: A review on corrosion, biocompatibility and surface modifications. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2016;68:948–963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.020.
24. Kiani F, Wen C, Li Y. Prospects and strategies for magnesium alloys as biodegradable implants from crystalline to bulk metallic glasses and composites — A review. Acta Biomaterialia. 2020;103:1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.023.
25. Willbold E, Weizbauer A, Loos A, Seitz JM, Angrisani N, Windhagen H, et al. Magnesium alloys: A stony pathway from intensive research to clinical reality. Different test methods and approval-related considerations. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2017;105(1):329–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35893.
26. Hamanishi C, Yoshii T, Totani Y, Tanaka S. Bone mineral density of lengthened rabbit tibia is enhanced by transplantation of fresh autologous bone marrow cells. An experimental study using dual X-ray absorptiometry. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1994;(303):250–255. PMID:8194242.
27. Dong Y, Zhou B, Huang Z, Huang Q, Cui S, Li Y, et al. Evaluating bone remodeling by measuring Hounsfield units in a rabbit model of rhinosinusitis: Is it superior to measuring bone thickness? International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology. 2018;8(11):1342–1348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22205.
Review
For citations:
Gordienko II, Marchenko ES, Borisov SA, Chernyy SP, Tsap NA, Shishelova AA, Khrustalev AP, Butyagin PI, Arbuzova SS. Experimental Study of the Corrosive and Biocompatible Properties of Bioresorbable Mg-Ca-Zn Alloy Implants. Ural Medical Journal. 2024;23(1):77-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52420/2071-5943-2024-23-1-77-89. EDN: LEVZFV