Preview

Ural Medical Journal

Advanced search

Medical and Social Portrait, Course and Outcomes of Pregnancy in Women with High Levels of Anxiety

https://doi.org/10.52420/umj.24.2.21

EDN: AJPJHD

Abstract

The psychoemotional status of pregnant women is influenced by factors such as age, income, marital status, and employment status. Pregnant women with high levels of anxiety have a more complicated course of pregnancy and childbirth. The definition of the features of a woman’s psychoemotional state during pregnancy remains relevant.

The aim of the study is to determine the features of the medical and social profile, the course of pregnancy and obstetric outcomes in patients with high levels of anxiety.

Materials and methods. Psychological testing was conducted to determine the personal level of anxiety in 100 pregnant women for the period 2013–2016 and in 100 patients for 2018–2021. The medical and social portrait, the course of pregnancy and its outcomes were studied in 16 patients with high levels of anxiety for the period 2013–2016 (group 1) and in 21 — for the period 2018–2021 (group 2).

Results. Patients from the 2018–2021 cohort were statistically significantly more likely to be employees in most cases, and there was a tendency to decrease the number of married women. Patients with high levels of anxiety in both time cohorts had complications of the gestational period such as toxicosis of the first half of pregnancy, the threat of termination of pregnancy, and moderate preeclampsia. The percentage of premature births remains consistently high. Conclusion. The results indicate the determination of the characteristics of a woman’s psycho-emotional state during the gestational period for a personalized approach to pregnancy management tactics in order to prevent unfavorable obstetric and perinatal outcomes.

About the Authors

K. S. Smolyakova
Center of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 1
Russian Federation

Kristina S. Smolyakova — Obstetrician and Gynecologist.

Chelyabinsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflicts of interest



M. V. Astashkina
South Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Marina V. Astashkina — Candidate of Sciences (Medicine), Assistant of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Chelyabinsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflicts of interest



V. F. Dolgushina
South Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Valentina F. Dolgushina — Doctor of Sciences (Medicine), Professor, Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Chelyabinsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflicts of interest



I. V. Kurnosenko
South Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Ilona V. Kurnosenko — Doctor of Sciences (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Chelyabinsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflicts of interest



T. V. Kozyreva
South Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Tatyana V. Kozyreva — Candidate of Sciences (Medicine), Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Chelyabinsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflicts of interest



References

1. Salov IA, Naumova YuV, Parshin AV, Lomovitskaya MV. Psychological status of women with miscarriage. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2023;17(6):740–750. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17749/23137347/ob.gyn.rep.2023.462.

2. Kazemi A, Dadkhah A. Changes in prenatal depression and anxiety levels in low risk pregnancy among Iranian women: A prospective study. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry. 2022;14(1):e12419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12419.

3. Koc E, Baltaci N, Bal S. Does telecounseling reduce anxiety and depression during pregnancy? A randomized controlled trial. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira. 2023;69(6):e20221213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20221213.

4. Roddy Mitchell A, Gordon H, Atkinson J, Walker SP, Middleton A, Tong S, et al. Prevalence of perinatal anxiety and related disorders in lowand middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open. 2023;6 (11): e2343711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43711.

5. Dennis CL, Falah-Hassani K, Shiri R. Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: Systematic review and metaanalysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2017;210(5):315–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.116.187179.

6. Fawcett EJ, Fairbrother N, Cox ML, White IR, Fawcett JM. The prevalence of anxiety disorders during pregnancy and the postpartum period: A multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2019; 80(4):18r12527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.18r12527.

7. Domínguez-Solís E, Lima-Serrano M, Lima-Rodríguez JS. Non-pharmacological interventions to reduce anxiety in pregnancy, labour and postpartum: A systematic review. Midwifery. 2021;102:103126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.103126.

8. Mazurova L, Kelchikova S, Moskaleva E, Dubovitskaya Z, Malinovskaya N. Assessment of anxiety and related factors in pregnant women. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021;(3):66–72. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2021.3.66-72.

9. Bedaso A, Adams J, Peng W, Sibbritt D. The relationship between social support and mental health problems during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reproductive Health. 2021;18(1):162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01209-5.

10. Yeşilçınar İ, Acavut G, Güvenç G. Anxiety during the pregnancy and affecting factors: A cross-sectional study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2023;307(1):301–309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06590-5.

11. Saridi M, Toska A, Latsou D, Chondropoulou MA, Matsioula A, Sarafis P. Assessment of quality of life and psycho-emotional burden in pregnant women in Greece. European Journal of Midwifery. 2022;22(6):13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/145963.

12. Insan N, Weke A, Forrest S, Rankin J. Social determinants of antenatal depression and anxiety among women in South Asia: A systematic review & meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0263760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263760.

13. Radzinskii VE. Portrait of a modern patient: Signs of modernity. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2020;20(6):7–11. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush2020200617.

14. Belotserkovtseva LD, Ivannikov SE, Borisova TD. Influence of maternal age on the course and outcomes of pregnancy at the first birth. (Single-center study). Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2021; 21(4):48–53. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush20212104148.

15. Dawes L, Waugh JJS, Lee A, Groom KM. Psychological well-being of women at high risk of spontaneous preterm birth cared for in a specialised preterm birth clinic: A prospective longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(3):e056999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056999.

16. Gondane P, Kumbhakarn S, Maity P, Kapat K. Recent advances and challenges in the early diagnosis and treatment of preterm labor. Bioengineering. 2024;11(2):161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11020161.

17. Khalesi ZB, Bokaie M. The association between pregnancy-specific anxiety and preterm birth: A cohort study. African Health Sciences. 2018;18(3):569–575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v18i3.14.

18. Runkle JD, Risley K, Roy M, Sugg MM. Association between perinatal mental health and pregnancy and neonatal complications: A retrospective birth cohort study. Women’s Health Issues. 2023;33(3):289–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2022.12.001.

19. Grigoriadis S, Graves L, Peer M, Mamisashvili L, Tomlinson G, Vigod SN, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of antenatal anxiety on postpartum outcomes. Archives of Women’s Mental Health. 2019;22(5):543–556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-018-0930-2.

20. Gopalan P, Spada ML, Shenai N, Brockman I, Keil M, Livingston S, et al. Postpartum depression-identifying risk and access to intervention. Current Psychiatry Reports. 2022;24(12):889–896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-022-01392-7.

21. Rogers A, Obst S, Teague SJ, Rossen L, Spry EA, Macdonald JA, et al. Association between maternal perinatal depression and anxiety and child and adolescent development: A meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics. 2020; 174(11):1082–1092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.2910.

22. Polte C, Junge C, von Soest T, Seidler A, Eberhard-Gran M, Garthus-Niegel S. Impact of maternal perinatal anxiety on social-emotional development of 2-year-olds, a prospective study of Norwegian mothers and their offspring: The impact of perinatal anxiety on child development. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2019;23(3):386–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2684-x.

23. Madigan S, Oatley H, Racine N, Fearon RMP, Schumacher L, Akbari E, et al. A meta-analysis of maternal prenatal depression and anxiety on child socioemotional development. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2018;57(9):645–657.e8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2018.06.012.

24. Vitt N, Vecchi M, James J, Belot M. Maternal stress during pregnancy and children’s diet: Evidence from a population of low socioeconomic status. Nutrition. 2022;93:111423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2021.111423.

25. Arvanitidou O, Kosmas I, Michalopoulos CK, Doumanidou M, Ierodiakonou-Benou I, Athanasiadis A, et al. The impact of stress and depression on the outcome of human gestation. Cureus. 2023; 15(11): e48700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.48700.


Review

For citations:


Smolyakova KS, Astashkina MV, Dolgushina VF, Kurnosenko IV, Kozyreva TV. Medical and Social Portrait, Course and Outcomes of Pregnancy in Women with High Levels of Anxiety. Ural Medical Journal. 2025;24(2):21–29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52420/umj.24.2.21. EDN: AJPJHD

Views: 159


ISSN 2071-5943 (Print)
ISSN 2949-4389 (Online)