Preview

Ural Medical Journal

Advanced search

The Use of Photodynamic Therapy with the Photosensitizer Radachlorin at the Stage of Surgical Treatment in the Complex Therapy of Patients with Nephroblastoma

https://doi.org/10.52420/umj.25.3.7

EDN: DMHWIH

Abstract

Introduction. Malignant neoplasms in children belong to the category of socially significant pathology. Tumor progression results from local recurrence, the substrate of which is the presence of residual tumor tissue in the resection area, which requires a high level of surgical ablastics. Application of additional intervention on residual tumor tissue by means of new surgical technologies results in an increased radicalism of surgical treatment of patients with retroperitoneal tumors.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the developed technique of intraoperative photodynamic therapy (PDT) at the stage of surgical treatment of children with nephroblastoma.

Materials and methods. The study group included 66 patients with nephroblastoma, 35 boys and 31 girls. Patients in the control group (n = 35) underwent surgical treatment in combination with chemotherapy and radiation therapy according to the SIOP protocol. Patients in the main group (n = 31) received the SIOP protocol therapy in combination with PDT. A combination of surgical treatment with intraoperative PDT was used to increase the radicality of surgical intervention and reduce the local recurrence rate.

Results. In the group of patients who received PDT in addition to the surgical treatment, the death rate during the 5-year follow-up period was lower, and the survival rate, respectively, was higher — 90.3 % versus 71.4 % (p = 0.050).

Conclusion. The proposed technique of intraoperative PDT within the complex treatment of retroperitoneal tumors results in better outcomes, significantly increasing survival rate in patients with retroperitoneal tumors. 

About the Authors

N. M. Rostovtsev
Chelyabinsk Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital; South Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Nikolay M. Rostovtsev — Candidate of Sciences (Medicine), Deputy Chief Physician for Surgery, Chelyabinsk Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital; Associate Professor of the Department of General and Pediatric Surgery, South Ural State Medical University 

Chelyabinsk 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflict of interest. 



V. G. Polyakov
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Vladimir G. Polyakov — Doctor of Sciences (Medicine), Professor, Full Member (Academician) of the Rus‑ sian Academy of Sciences, Advisor to the Director of the Research Institute of Children’s Oncology and Hematology 

Moscow 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflict of interest. 



N. E. Kuzmina
Chelyabinsk Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital; South Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Natalya E. Kuzmina — Candidate of Sciences (Medicine), Radiologist, Chelyabinsk Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital; Assistant of the Department of Oncology, Radiation Diagnostics and Radiation Therapy, South Ural State Medical University

Chelyabinsk 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflict of interest. 



E. A. Neizvestnykh
Chelyabinsk Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital; South Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Elena A. Neizvestnykh — Candidate of Sciences (Medicine), Associate Professor of the Department of Gen‑ eral and Pediatric Surgery

Chelyabinsk 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflict of interest. 



A. V. Kuzmina
South Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Anastasiya V. Kuzmina — Specialist’s Degree Student of the Faculty of Dentistry 

Chelyabinsk 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflict of interest. 



M. A. Minko
South Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Maksim A. Minko — Specialist’s Degree Student of the Faculty of Dentistry 

Chelyabinsk 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflict of interest. 



References

1. Rykov MYu, Baibarina EN, Chumakova OV, Polyakov VG. Cancer epidemiology in children in the Russian Federation: Analysis of key indicators and ways to overcome the statistical data defects. Oncopediatria. 2017;4(3):159–176. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZEORHH.

2. Rykov MYu, Polyakov VG (eds.). Epidemiology of malignant neoplasms in children: the main indicators in 2011–2016. Moscow: Sechenov University Publishing House; 2017. 208 p. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZGRGUF.

3. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A, et al. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. International Journal of Cancer. 2021;149(4):778–789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33588.

4. Graf N, Rübe C, Gessler M. Nierentumoren. In: Gadner H, Gaedicke G, Niemeyer C, Ritter J (eds.). Pädiatrische hämatologie und onkologie. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2006. P. 847–864. (In German). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29036-2_69.

5. Illade L, Hernandez-Marques C, Cormenzana M, Lassaletta Á, Andión Catalán M, Ruano D, et al. Wilms’ tumour: A review of 15 years recent experience. Anales de Pediatria. 2018;88(3):140–149. (In Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2017.03.019.

6. Miniati D, Gay AN, Parks KV, Naik-Mathuria BJ, Hicks J, Nuchtern JG, et al. Imaging accuracy and incidence of Wilms’ and non-Wilms’ renal tumors in children. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2008;43(7):1301– 1307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.02.077.

7. Fedorova DV. The differential diagnosis of neuroblastoma and Wilms’ tumor: A clinical observation and review of the literature. Russian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology. 2015;2(4):91–97. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WAAGLZ.

8. Meyer JS, Harty MP, Khademian Z. Imaging of neuroblastoma and Wilms’ tumor. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America. 2002;10(2):275–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1064-9689(01)00010-1.

9. Varan A. Wilms’ tumor in children: An overview. Nephron. Clinical practice. 2008;108(2):c83–c90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000113012.

10. Kessel D. Death pathways associated with photodynamic therapy. Medical Laser Application. 2006;21(4):219– 224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mla.2006.05.006.

11. Mroz P, Hashmi JT, Huang YY, Lange N, Hamblin MR. Stimulation of anti-tumor immunity by photodynamic therapy. Expert Review of Clinical Immunology. 2011;7(1):75–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1586/eci.10.81.

12. Bacellar IO, Tsubone TM, Pavani C, Baptista MS. Photodynamic efficiency: From molecular photochemistry to cell death. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015;16(9):20523–20559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160920523.

13. Filatova NV, Sidorenko EI, Filatov VV, Ponomarev GV, Muravyov MV. Application of photodynamic therapy with the drug Photoditazin for the treatment of corneal neovascularization in children and adolescents. Russian Journal of Biotherapy. 2012;11(2):56. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PXJXBD.

14. Kumar N, Warren CB. Photodynamic therapy for dermatologic conditions in the pediatric population: A literature review. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine. 2017;33(3):125–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12296.

15. Schipmann S, Müther M, Stögbauer L, Zimmer S, Brokinkel B, Holling M, et al. Combination of ALA-induced fluorescence-guided resection and intraoperative open photodynamic therapy for recurrent glioblastoma: Case series on a promising dual strategy for local tumor control. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2020;134(2):426– 436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.11.JNS192443.

16. Schwake M, Nemes A, Dondrop J, Schroeteler J, Schipmann S, Senner V, et al. In-vitro use of 5-ALA for photodynamic therapy in pediatric brain tumors. Neurosurgery. 2018;83(6):1328–1337. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1093/neuros/nyy054.

17. da Silva Barbosa P, Duarte DA, Leite MF, de Sant’ Anna GR. Photodynamic therapy in pediatric dentistry. Case Reports in Dentistry. 2014;2014:217172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/217172.

18. Wang J, Li M, Tang D, Gu W, Mao J, Shu Q. Current treatment for Wilms tumor: COG and SIOP standards. World Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2019;2(3):e000038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2019-000038.

19. Reinhard H, Semler O, Bürger D, Bode U, Flentje M, Göbel U, et al. Results of the SIOP 93-01/GPOH trial and study for the treatment of patients with unilateral nonmetastatic Wilms Tumor. Klinische Pädiatrie. 2004;216(3):132–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-822625.

20. Machinskaya EA, Ivanova-Radkevich VI. Review of selective accumulation of photosensitizers with different chemical structure in tumor tissue. Photodynamic Therapy and Photodyagnosis. 2013;2(4):28–32. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SKFZMJ.

21. Sukhova TE. Comparative assessment of the efficacy of photodynamic therapy of basal cell skin cancer with the intralesional administration of radachlorin and fotoditazin. Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2016;44(1):78– 87. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TNHNDU.

22. Filonenko EV, Serova LG, Ivanova-Radkevich VI. Results from phase III clinical trials with radachlorin for photodynamic therapy of pre-cancer and early cancer of cervix. Biomedical Photonics. 2015;4(3):36–42. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24931/2413-9432-2015-4-3-36-42.

23. Vashakmadze LА, Filonenko ЕV, Cheremisov VV, Khomyakov VМ. Intraoperative photodynamic therapy for non-organ retroperitoneal tumors. Photodynamic Therapy and Photodyagnosis. 2013;2(2):8–12. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QZMPDD.

24. Rostovtsev N, Zhukovskaya E, Pasternak A, Kotlyarov A, Mustakimov B. Morphological study of the combined laser and photodynamic effect with radachlorin on the structure of experimental Ehrlich sarcoma. Revista Inclusiones. 2020;7(spec. nr):507–524. URL: https://revistainclusiones.org/index.php/inclu/article/view/1389.

25. Weirich A, Ludwig R, Graf N, Abel U, Leuschner I, Vujanic GM, et al. Survival in nephroblastoma treated according to the trial and study SIOP-9/GPOH with respect to relapse and morbidity. Annals of Oncology. 2004;15 (5):808–820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdh171.

26. Metzger ML, Dome JS. Current therapy for Wilms’ tumor. The Oncologist. 2005;10(10):815–826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.10-10-815.

27. Suleimanov EA, Kaprin AD, Кostin AA, Moskvicheva LI. Modern possibilities of diagnostics and treatment of patients with retroperitoneal tumors. Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2017;16(2):90–96. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2017-16-2-90-96.

28. Nambisan RN, Karakousis CP, Holyoke ED, Dougherty TJ. Intraoperative photodynamic therapy for retroperitoneal sarcomas. Cancer. 1988;61 (6):1248–1252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19880315)61:6<1248::aidcncr2820610632>3.0.co;2-5.

29. Filonenko EV, Saribekyan EK, Ivanova-Radkevich VI. Capabilities of intraoperative photodynamic therapy for treatment of locally advanced breast cancer. Biomedical Photonics. 2016;5(1):9–14. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24931/2413-9432-2016-5-1-9-14.

30. Kaprin AD, Suleimanov EA, Filonenko EV, Grishin NA, Khomyakov VM, Sidorov DV, et al. Intraoperative photodynamic therapy for peritoneal mesothelioma. Biomedical Photonics. 2017;6(3):4–10. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24931/2413-9432-2017-6-3-4-10.


Review

For citations:


Rostovtsev NM, Polyakov VG, Kuzmina NE, Neizvestnykh EA, Kuzmina AV, Minko MA. The Use of Photodynamic Therapy with the Photosensitizer Radachlorin at the Stage of Surgical Treatment in the Complex Therapy of Patients with Nephroblastoma. Ural Medical Journal. 2026;25(3):7–22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52420/umj.25.3.7. EDN: DMHWIH

Views: 41

JATS XML

ISSN 2949-4389 (Online)