Preview

Ural Medical Journal

Advanced search

Assessment of the Impact of Group Classes for Pregnant Women on Breastfeeding on the Success of Lactation Development

https://doi.org/10.52420/umj.25.3.50

EDN: JYKBNA

Abstract

Background. Since 2026, as part of the State Guarantees Program, health schools for pregnant women on breastfeeding have been introduced in medical organizations, which requires the development and testing of effective educational programs.

Objective is to evaluate the impact of training at the School of Health for Pregnant Women on Breastfeeding on the success of lactation in the early postnatal period.

Materials and methods. A prospective cohort study involving 228 mother — child couples was conducted. The main group (n = 110) consisted of women who completed training at the School of Health at 37–39 weeks of gestation. The control group (n = 118) consisted of women who had not completed training. Efficacy was assessed using the LATCH scale in two time periods: in the first 6–12 hours and 72 hours after delivery. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann — Whitney U-test and the χ 2 criterion.

Results. The median total LATCH score (Me [Q1; Q3]) in the main group was significantly higher than in the control group, both in the first 6–12 hours (7.0 [6.0; 9.0] vs. 5.5 [5.0; 7.0], p < 0.05) and 72 hours after delivery (8.5 [6.0; 10.0] and 7.0 [6.0; 8.0], p < 0.05). In the main group, breast grabbing problems (26.8 % and 38.4 %, p < 0.05), feeding discomfort (22.6 % and 38.1 %, p < 0.05), and the need for additional staff assistance (22.4 % and 44.2 %, p < 0.05) were less common than in the control group.

Conclusion. Studying at the School of Health for Pregnant Women on Breastfeeding contributes to the successful development of lactation. 

About the Authors

A. F. Kiosov
Regional Perinatal Center
Russian Federation

Andrey F. Kiosov — Candidate of Sciences (Medicine), Deputy Chief Physician, Neonatologist 

Chelyabinsk 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflict of interest. 



E. E. Voropaeva
Regional Perinatal Center; South Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Ekaterina E. Voropaeva — Doctor of Sciences (Medicine), Chief Physician, Regional Perinatal Center; Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, South Ural State Medical University

Chelyabinsk  


Competing Interests:

The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflict of interest. 



References

1. Ladodo OB, Zhdanova SI, Zubkov VV, Kodentsova VM, Degtyarev DN, Ryumina II, et al. Breastfeeding in Russia: Problems and prospects. Public Health. 2023;3(1):18–32. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21045/2782-1676-2023-3-1-18-32.

2. Gmoshinskaya MV, Aleshina IV, Vorobyоva IN. Optimal duration of breastfeeding. Medical Council. 2024;18(1):19–24. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2023-493.

3. Prentice AM. Breastfeeding in the modern world. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2022;78 (Suppl 2):29– 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000524354.

4. Kiosov AF. Lactation support, prevention and treatment of hypogalactia. Lechaschi Vrach. 2019;(6):7–11. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26295/OS.2019.82.82.001.

5. Feldman-Winter L, Kellams A, Peter-Wohl S, Scott Taylor J, Lee KG, Terrell MJ, et al. Evidence-based updates on the first week of exclusive breastfeeding among infants ≥35 weeks. Pediatrics. 2020;145(4):e20183696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-3696.

6. Zakharova IN, Abolyan LV, Sugyan NG, Kuchina AE. Protecting, promoting, and supporting breastfeeding practices and the introduction of complementary foods. Medical Council. 2021;(11):29–35. (In Russ.). DOI https://doi.org/10.21518/2079701X-2021-11-29-35.

7. Ladodo OB, Butskaya TV, Kodentsova VM, Risnik DV, Gmoshinskaya MV, Makarova SG, et al. Breastfeeding in the Russian Federation: Results of a survey of nursing mothers. Kremlin Medicine. Clinical Bulletin. 2022;(4):9–15. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.48612/cgma/a5tm-hp4b-6xf5.

8. Gomboeva NB, Alsagaev AV, Lubsanova LA, Sambueva YuM. Grade readiness of expectant mothers to breastfeed. Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal “Pulse”. 2024;26 (8):80–86. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26787/nydha-2686-6838-2024-26-8-80-86.

9. Santacruz-Salas E, Aranda-Reneo I, Segura-Fragoso A, Cobo-Cuenca A, Laredo-Aguilera J, Carmona-Torres J. Mothers’ expectations and factors influencing exclusive breastfeeding during the first 6 months. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;17(1):77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010077.

10. Kehinde J, O’Donnell C, Grealish A. The effectiveness of prenatal breastfeeding education on breastfeeding uptake postpartum: A systematic review. Midwifery. 2023;118:103579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.10357.

11. Hoddinott P, Britten J, Prescott GJ, Tappin D, Ludbrook A, Godden DJ. Effectiveness of policy to provide breastfeeding groups (BIG) for pregnant and breastfeeding mothers in primary care: Cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;338:a3026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a3026.

12. Ladodo OB, Olina AA, Makarova SG, Zubkov BB, Chutkova DA, Moshkina NA, et al. Russian and international programs to support pregnant women, women in labor, and breastfed children. Medical Opponent. 2023;(4):56–62. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CQOMKL.

13. Kashirskaya EI, Kameneva OP, Cheremina NI, Polyanina EZ. To the issue of breastfeeding support: From theory to practice. Medical Council. 2020;(1):24–29. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2020-1-24-29.

14. Polyanina EZ. Difficulties in breastfeeding: Ways to solve the problem. Medical Council. 2021;(11):7–13. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2021-11-7-13.

15. Moiseeva KE, Zastupova AA, Taitz AN, Harbedia SD, Alexandrovich JS. Organization of the work of prenatal classes at women’s health clinics: Problems and solutions. Social Aspects of Public Health. 2025;71(5):23. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21045/2071-5021-2025-71-5-23.

16. Ladodo OB, Olina AA, Zubkov VV, Makarova SG, Chutkova DA, Boris DA, et al. Work experience of consultants in supporting breastfeeding in the world, prospects for the Russian Federation. Medical Opponent. 2024;(2):53–58. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QYVJGT.

17. Ignateva AA, Ladodo OB, Dolgushina NV. Breastfeeding during the normal postpartum period: Clinical recommendations. Medical Opponent. 2025;(2):6–11. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TFIEBG.

18. Borovik TE, Skvortsova VA, Lukoyanova OL, Yatsyk GV, Pyrieva EA, Gmoshinskaya MV, et al. The consensus on issues of feeding children in the first year of life, included in the updated version of the “National program for optimizing the feeding of children in the first year of life in the Russian Federation” 2019. Pediatrics. 2019;98(1):210–216. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24110/0031-403X-2019-98-1-210-216.

19. Skvortsova VA, Borovik TE, Fisenko AP, Timofeeva AG, Bushueva TV, Lukoyanova OL, et al. Results evaluation of the implementation of the “Program for Optimizing Feeding of Children in the First Year of Life in the Russian Federation” dated 2009. Pediatrics. Consilium Medicum. 2022;(4):286–294. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26442/26586630.2022.4.201969.

20. Rapheal SM, Rajaiah B, Karupanan R, Abiramalatha T, Ramakrishnan S. LATCH Score for identification and correction of breastfeeding problems — a prospective observational study. Indian Pediatrics. 2023;60:37–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-023-2692-9.

21. Sharma A, Ramaswamy GG. LATCH Score: Bridging the gap in the observational study. Indian Pediatrs. 2023;60:500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-023-2920-3.

22. Shah MH, Roshan R, Parikh T, Sathe S, Vaidya U, Pandit A. LATCH Score at discharge: A predictor of weight gain and exclusive breastfeeding at 6 weeks in term healthy babies. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 2021;72(2):e48–e52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002927.

23. Fadiloglu E, Karatas E, Tez R, Cagan M, Unal C, Nar M, et al. Assessment of factors affecting breastfeeding performance and LATCH score: A prospective cohort study. Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie. 2021;225(4):353–360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1255-3525.

24. Lamba I, Bhardwaj MK, Verma A, Meena E. Comparative study of breastfeeding in caesarean delivery and vaginal delivery using LATCH Score and maternal serum prolactin level in early postpartum period. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India. 2023;73(2):139–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-022-01698-9.

25. Zakharova IN, Sugian NG, Orobinskaya YaV. Lactation dominant: How does a woman make her choice? A review. Pediatrics. Consilium Medicum. 2025;(2):114–119. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26442/26586630.2025.2.203341.


Review

For citations:


Kiosov AF, Voropaeva EE. Assessment of the Impact of Group Classes for Pregnant Women on Breastfeeding on the Success of Lactation Development. Ural Medical Journal. 2026;25(3):50–58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52420/umj.25.3.50. EDN: JYKBNA

Views: 130

JATS XML

ISSN 2949-4389 (Online)