Fetal monitoring: collapse or breakthrough
https://doi.org/10.25694/URMJ.2018.13.38
Abstract
Methods of intrauterine diagnosis of the fetus are far from perfect. The most promising assessment method based on a computerized analysis of the heart rhythm of the severity of hypoxic effects on the central nervous system of the fetus is the analysis of the characteristics of its heart rhythm. Modern fetal technologies validated using the Dawis-Redman criteria make it possible to diagnose fetal hypoxia with high sensitivity and specificity, which provides the basis for making tactical decisions. The remaining methods of analysis of cardiotograms are only screening, aimed at identifying risk groups for this pathology.
About the Author
V. V. Kovalev
ФГБОУ ВО «Уральский государственный медицинский университет» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Акушерство, национальное руководство. Под ред. Савельевой Г.М., Сухих Г.Т., Серова В.Н., Радзинского В.Е. Издание 2-е переработанное и дополненное, 2015, 1078 с.
2. FIGO Guidelines FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Adjunctive technologies Gerard H. Visser, Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; for the FIGO Intrapartum FetalMonitoring Expert Consensus Panel, International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 131 (2015) 25-29
3. Kubli F.W., Hon E.H., Khazin A.F., Takemura H. Observations on heart rate and pH in the human fetus during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 104(8): 1190-206.
4. Neilson JP. Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 5: CD000116.
5. Ayres-de-Campos D., Ugwumadu A., Banfield P., Lynch P., Amin P., Horwell D., et al. A randomised clinical trial of intrapartum fetal monitoring with computer analysis and alerts versus previously available monitoring. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010; 10: 71.
6. Schiermeier S., Westhof G., Leven A., Hatzmann H., Reinhard J. Intra- and interobserver variability of intrapartum cardiotocography: a multicenter study comparing the FIGO classification with computer analysis software. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2011; 72(3): 169-73.
7. Parer J.T., Hamilton E.F. Comparison of 5 experts and computer analysis in rule-based fetal heart rate interpretation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203(5): 451. e1-7.
Review
For citations:
Kovalev VV. Fetal monitoring: collapse or breakthrough. Ural Medical Journal. 2018;(13):5-8. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25694/URMJ.2018.13.38
Views:
103
Email this article 