Preview

Ural Medical Journal

Advanced search

Diagnostic Errors of Nodular Adenomyosis on the Example of a Clinical Case

https://doi.org/10.52420/umj.23.6.70

EDN: OEWULV

Abstract

Introduction. One of the less common forms of adenomyosis is the nodular type, characterized by localized foci composed of damaged endometrial glands and altered muscle and connective tissue fibers. Diagnosing nodular adenomyosis is oſten challenging, with the diagnosis frequently made intraoperatively or during histological examination.

The purpose of the work. To analyze a clinical case involving a patient with nodular adenomyosis and a prolonged history of pelvic pain syndrome, aiming to identify diagnostic errors associated with this condition.

Materials and methods. A clinical case was reviewed based on the patient’s medical history and treatments conducted prior to admission to the Gynecology Department of the Stavropol State Medical University Medical Center.

Results and discussion. The chronology of diagnosis and treatment, along with an analysis of errors that led to the chronicity of the pathological process and subsequent deterioration in the patient’s quality of life and overall condition, is presented. This clinical case demonstrated that a gynecologist’s primary responsibility when examining patients with pelvic pain syndrome is to conduct detailed diagnostics. The authors re-evaluated the patient’s magnetic resonance imaging scans and suspected the diagnosis of “nodular adenomyosis”, which justified performing laparoscopy to confirm the condition. During the procedure, the diagnosis was confirmed, and the nodular adenomyosis was excised simultaneously. To prevent adhesion formation, an anti-adhesion barrier was applied.

Conclusion. Laparoscopy is one of the most critical methods for diagnosing pelvic pain syndrome, as it enables early diagnosis, detailed examination of pelvic and abdominal organs, and the simultaneous execution of therapeutic interventions.

About the Authors

A. A. Grigoryants
Stavropol State Medical University
Russian Federation

Armen A. Grigoryants — Candidate of Sciences (Medicine), Assistant of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 2

Stavropol


Competing Interests:

The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflicts of interest.



V. A. Akseneko
Stavropol State Medical University
Russian Federation

Viktor A. Akseneko — Doctor of Sciences (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with a Postgraduate Education Course

Stavropol


Competing Interests:

The authors declare the absence of obvious or potential conflicts of interest.



References

1. Sharara FI, Kheil MH, Feki A, Rahman S, Klebanoff JS, Ayoubi JM, et al. Current and prospective treatment of adenomyosis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021;10(15):3410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153410.

2. Twiddy H, Bradshaw A, Chawla R, Johnson S, Lane N. Female chronic pelvic pain: the journey to diagnosis and beyond. Pain Management. 2017;7(3):155–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt-2016-0052.

3. Vannuccini S, Luisi S, Tosti C, Sorbi F, Petraglia F. Role of medical therapy in the management of uterine adenomyosis. Fertility and Sterility. 2018;109(3):398–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.013.

4. Bougie O, Nwosu I, Warshafsky C. Revisiting the impact of race/ethnicity in endometriosis. Reproduction and Fertility. 2022;3(2): R34–R41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/raf-21-0106.

5. Tokaeva ES, Orazov MR, Barsegyan LK. Quality of life in patients with endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2016;5(51):19–21. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/xyhlof.

6. Orazov MR. Immune homeostasis of peripheral blood in women with pain syndrome in adenomyosis. Difficult Patient. 2014;12(12):39–44. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/tgtngb.

7. Lamvu G, Carrillo J, Ouyang C, Rapkin A. Chronic pelvic pain in women: A review. JAMA. 2021; 325(23):2381–2391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.2631.

8. Vannuccini S, Petraglia F. Recent advancesin understanding and managing adenomyosis [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research. 2019;8:283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17242.1.

9. Gerasimov AM, Malyshkina AI, Kuligina MV, Krasilnikova AK, Polumiskov DM, Abdullaeva LK. Frequency and structure of external genital endometriosis in hospitalized patients. Gynecology. 2021;23(2):184–189. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26442/20795696.2021.2.200783.

10. Borovaya TG. Sources and age peculiarities of the endometrioid cysts. Morphology. 2016;149(3):40. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/wjipzp.

11. Siqueira-Campos VM, de Deus MSC, Poli-Neto OB, Rosa-E-Silva JC, de Deus JM, Conde DM. Current challenges in the management of chronic pelvic pain in women: From bench to bedside. International Journal of Women’s Health. 2022;14:225–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147%2FIJWH.S224891.

12. Chapron C, Marcellin L, Borghese B, Santulli P. Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2019;15(11):666–682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0245-z.

13. Till SR, As-Sanie S, Schrept A. Psychology of chronic pelvic pain: Prevalence, neurobiological vulnerabilities, and treatment. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019;62(1):22–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/grf.0000000000000412.

14. Stratton P, Berkley KJ. Chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis: Translational evidence of the relationship and implications. Human Reproduction Update. 2011;17(3):327–346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmq050.

15. Moawad G, Fruscalzo A, Youssef Y, Kheil M, Tawil T, Nehme J, et al. Adenomyosis: An updated review on diagnosis and classification. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023;12(14):4828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144828.

16. Orazov MR, Radzinsky VE, Khamoshina MB, Nosenko EN, Lebedeva MG, Sounov MA. Proangiogenic features of chronic pelvic pain caused by adenomyosis. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2016;32(Suppl 2):7–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2016.1232902.

17. Majorana A, Incandela D, Parazzini F, Alio W, Mercurio A, Giambanco L, et al. The effectiveness of dienogest in reducing pain in women with endometriosis: A 12-month single-center experience. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2017;296(3):429–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4442-5.

18. Jones AV, Hockley JRF, Hyde C, Gorman D, Sredic-Rhodes A, Bilsland J, et al. Genome-wide associative analysis of the severity of dysmenorrhea pain reveals an association on chromosome 1p13.2, near the nerve growth factor locus. Pain. 2016;157(11):2571–2581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000678.

19. Pierce SJ, Gazvani MR, Farquharson RG. Long-term use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs and hormone replacement therapy in the management of endometriosis: A randomized trial with a 6-year follow-up. Fertility and Sterility. 2000;74(5):964–968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01537-5.

20. Lee DY, Park HG, Yun BK, Choi D. The effect of various addback regimens on hypoestrogenic problems in postoperative treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in endometriosis. Obstetrics & Gynecology Science. 2016;59(1):32–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2016.59.1.32.

21. Taylor HS, Giudice LC, Lessey BA, Abrao MS, Kotarski J, Archer DF, et al. Treatment of endometriosis-associated pain with elagolix, an oral GnRH antagonist. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;377(1): 28–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1700089.

22. Kartha GK, Kerr H, Shoskes DA. Clinical phenotyping of urologic pain patients. Current Opinion in Urology. 2013;23(6):560–564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/mou.0b013e3283652a9d.

23. Hanno PM, Erickson D, Moldwin R, Faraday MM. Diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: AUA guideline amendment. Journal of Urology. 2015;193(5):1545–1553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.086.


Review

For citations:


Grigoryants AA, Akseneko VA. Diagnostic Errors of Nodular Adenomyosis on the Example of a Clinical Case. Ural Medical Journal. 2024;23(6):70–79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52420/umj.23.6.70. EDN: OEWULV

Views: 155


ISSN 2071-5943 (Print)
ISSN 2949-4389 (Online)