Comparative analysis of outcomes of vaginal delivery in patients with uterine scar
https://doi.org/10.25694/URMJ.2018.04.063
Abstract
A comparative analysis of obstetric and perinatal outcomes of vaginal delivery in women with a scar on the uterus was performed. The main indications for urgent abdominal delivery in patients with a scar on the uterus were: the inconsistency of the scar on the uterus, the primary weakness of labor and the clinically narrow pelvis. Newborns from mothers with a scar on the uterus, which were naturally delivered, had more favorable health indicators (early discharge home, significantly less need for further nursing and supervision in the separation of neonatal pathology).
About the Authors
O. V. Prokhorova
ФБГОУ ВО «Уральский государственный медицинский университет» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
T. A. Oboskalova
ФБГОУ ВО «Уральский государственный медицинский университет» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
K. G. Tikholaz
ФБГОУ ВО «Уральский государственный медицинский университет» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
L. A. Vitebskaya
ФБГОУ ВО «Уральский государственный медицинский университет» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Ana Pilar Betrdn, Jianfeng Ye, Anne-Beth Moller. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016; 11(2): e0148343.
2. Quinlan J.D., Murphy N.J. Cesarean delivery: counseling issues and complication management. Am Fam Physician. 2015 Feb 1; 91(3): 178-84.
3. Bermüdez-Tamayo C., Johri M., Chaillet N. Budget impact of a program for safely reducing caesarean sections in Canada. Midwifery 2018; 9,60: 20-26.
4. Айламазян Э.К., Кузьминых Т.У, Поленов И.Н и др. Подготовка беременных с рубцом на матке к родоразрешению. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней 2008; LVU: 1: 1-7.
5. Amin P., Zaher S., Penketh R. et al. Falling caesarean section rate and improving intra-partum outcomes: a prospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 19: 1-6.
6. Curtin SC, Gregory KD, Korst LM, Uddin SF. Maternal Morbidity for Vaginal and Cesarean Deliveries, According to Previous Cesarean History: New Data From the Birth Certificate, 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015; 64(4): 1.
7. Тютюнник В.Л, Балушкина А.А. Возможность ро-доразрешения через естественные родовые пути после операции кесарева сечения. Русский медицинский журнал 2014; 1: 8-11.
8. MicekM., Kosinska-Kaczynska K., GodekB. Birth after a previous cesarean section - what is most important in making a decision? Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2014; 35(8): 718-23.
9. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth After Previous Caesarean Birth. Green-top Guideline No 45. October 2015.
10. Sabol B., Denman M.A., Guise J.M. Vaginal birth after cesarean: an effective method to reduce cesarean. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun; 58(2): 309-19.
11. Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery: Practice Bulletin No. 184. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130(5): 217.
12. Klein M.C. Cesarean section on maternal request: a societal and professional failure and symptom of a much larger problem. Birth 2012; 39(4): 305-10.
Review
For citations:
Prokhorova OV, Oboskalova TA, Tikholaz KG, Vitebskaya LA. Comparative analysis of outcomes of vaginal delivery in patients with uterine scar. Ural Medical Journal. 2018;(5):12-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25694/URMJ.2018.04.063
Views:
112
Email this article 