Features of the Course of Pregnancy and Childbirth in Women of Different Age Groups
https://doi.org/10.52420/umj.24.4.67
EDN: MKCRGD
Abstract
Introduction. Improving the medical care for parturients in different age groups, taking into account complications of pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum period is one of the main tasks of modern obstetrics within the framework of the “Midwifery 2030” program.
The aim of study is to identify and conduct a comparative analysis of the course’s features of pregnancy and childbirth in different age groups of women.
Materials and methods. The retrospective analysis of 400 womens’ histories of the Sverdlovsk Region aged 16– 49 years was conducted. The women were divided into 4 groups. The work included a comparative analysis of the following identified: 10 pregnancy, 9 childbirth complications and 6 additional parameters.
Results and discussion. A direct connection between specific complications and the patient’s age was established, mechanisms for the development of pathological processes were proposed taking into account age-related changes. There is an increase in the incidence of cesarean sections in the direct proportion to the patient’s age. Under 20 years, exacerbations of kidney pathologies during pregnancy, injuries of the genital tract during childbirth, predominate. Over 30 years, gestational diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension predominate, childbirth often occurs with the development of bleeding. The age of 21–30 years is accompanied by lower percentage of complications and is the most favorable for pregnancy and childbirth.
Conclusion. The pregnancy and the childbirth at 20–30 years old is accompanied by the least number of complications. Complications typical for pregnant under 20 and over 30 years of age have a number of significant differences.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. A. RosyukRussian Federation
Elena A. Rosyuk — Candidate of Sciences (Medicine), Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with Medical Genetics Course, Institute of Pediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Ural State Medical University; Obstetrician-Gynecologist of the Consultative and Diagnostic Polyclinic, Ekaterinburg Clinical Perinatal Center.
Ekaterinburg
Competing Interests:
None
O. V. Pletnikova
Russian Federation
Oksana V. Pletnikova — Specialist’s Degree Student of the Institute of Clinical Medicine, Ural State Medical University.
Ekaterinburg
Competing Interests:
None
Yu. D. Oshkokova
Russian Federation
Yulia D. Oshkokova — Specialist’s Degree Student of the Institute of Clinical Medicine, Ural State Medical University.
Ekaterinburg
Competing Interests:
None
A. E. Mishchenko
Russian Federation
Anastasia E. Mishchenko — Specialist’s Degree Student of the Institute of Clinical Medicine, Ural State Medical University.
Ekaterinburg
Competing Interests:
None
References
1. Laryusheva TM, Baranov AN, Istomina NG, Sizyukhina NN, Revako PP. Distinctive features of obstetric and perinatal complications in young women 13–18 years old in comparison with women 20–25 years old. Pediatric and Adolescent Reproductive Health. 2017;(6):91–101. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZWBJIJ.
2. Kahveci B, Melekoglu R, Evruke IC, Cetin C. The effect of advanced maternal age on perinatal outcomes in nulliparous singleton pregnancies. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2018;18(1):343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1984-x.
3. Radzinsky VE, Khamoshina MB, Chakchurina IA, Orazmuradova AA. Obstetrical and perinatal complications in young primiparas. Doctor.Ru. Obstetrics and Perinatology. 2019;(7):6–11. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2019-162-7-6-11.
4. Barinov SV, Shamina IV, Tirskya YuI, Ralko VV, Dudkova GV, Frickel EA, et al. Age-related issues of pregnancy and birth outcomes. Fundamental and Clinical Medicine. 2016;1(2):18–24. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WNZGIZ.
5. Hochler H, Lipschuetz M, Suissa-Cohen Y, Weiss A, Sela HY, Yagel S, et al. The impact of advanced maternal age on pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective multicenter study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(17):5696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175696.
6. Aparcina EV, Protopopova NV, Naranzezeg B. Distinctive features and outcomes of pregnancy among adolescent. Bulletin of the East Siberian Scientific Center SB RAMS. 2004;(2 Pt 1):17–25. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HTKXGJ.
7. Arkhangelskiy VN, Kalachikova ON. Maternal age at first birth: Dynamics, regional differences, determination. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2020;13(5):200–217. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2020.5.71.12.
8. Khudoyarova D, Babaeva S, Shopulotova Z. Pregnancy and age. Eurasian Journal of Medical and Natural Sciences. 2024;4(7):91–95. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13219012.
9. Antonova YuT, Shamaeva VS, Sleptsova AD. Problems of early (teenage) pregnancy. International Journal of Medicine and Psychology. 2023;6(3):74–77. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DZRYBX.
10. Eliner Y, Gulersen M, Kasar A, Lenchner E, Grünebaum A, Chervenak FA, et al. Maternal and neonatal complications in teen pregnancies: A comprehensive study of 661,062 patients. The Journal of Adolescent Health. 2022;70(6):922–927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.12.014.
11. Aizman RI. Renal function and water and salt metabolism development in ontogeny. New Research. 2009; 3(20):108–120. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OKMESL.
12. Fang L, Shen B, Zhang H, Yin N, Cai J, Zhang J, et al. Clinical features and prognosis of pregnancy-related renal damage and pregnancy after chronic kidney disease. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2023;23(1):619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05941-7.
13. Mikhailin ES. Pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period in minors. Pediatric and Adolescent Reproductive Health. 2021;17(4):51–64. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33029/1816-2134-2021-17-4-51-64.
14. Belotserkovtseva LD, Ivannikov SE, Borisova TD. Influence of maternal age on the course and outcomes of pregnancy at the first birth (single-center study). Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2021; 21(4):48–53. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush20212104148.
15. Serova OF, Sedaya LV, Shutikova NV. Pregnancy outcomes in women of later reproductive age. Doctor.Ru. Obstetrics and Perinatology. 2020;19(1):12–15. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2020-19-1-12-15.
16. Herstad L, Klungsøyr K, Skjærven R, Tanbo T, Forsén L, Åbyholm T, et al. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: A population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2016;16:230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1028-3.
17. Demidova TYu, Ushanova FO. Pathophysiological aspects of the development of gestational diabetes. RMJ. Medical Review. 2019;10(II):86–91. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BEYIVL.
18. Zhu Y, Zhang C. Prevalence of gestational diabetes and risk of progression to type 2 diabetes: A global perspective. Current Diabetes Reports. 2016;16(1):7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-015-0699-x.
19. Fulop T, Larbi A, Douziech N. Insulin receptor and ageing. Pathologie et Biologie. 2003;51(10):574–580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patbio.2003.09.007.
20. Simonenko VB, Goryutsky VN, Dulin PA. The role of insulin resistance in pathogenesis of arterial hypertension. Clinical Medicine. 2014;92(9):27–33. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SNHHIV.
21. Khabibulina MM. Comparison of structural and geometric changes of the left heart, systolic and diastolic functions in women with hypertension in late fertile period and menopause. Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2009;2(2):75–78. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OZBXKB.
22. Denisova TP, Lipatova TE, Chernenkov YuV, Nazarov MI. The senile kidney. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2015;11(1):46–49. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TWKFXF.
23. Bebyakova NA, Levitsky SN, Shabalina IA, Komandresova TM, Kudryavtsev AV. Renin-angiotensin system gene polymorphism and aging. Human Ecology. 2023;30(8):571–587. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/humeco516580.
24. Buhimschi IA, Nayeri UA, Zhao G, Shook LL, Pensalfini A, Funai EF, et al. Protein misfolding, congophilia, oligomerization, and defective amyloid processing in preeclampsia. Science Translational Medicine. 2014; 6(245):245ra92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3008808.
25. Lin D, Li P, Fan D, Chen G, Wu S, Ye S, et al. Association between IVF/ICSI treatment and preterm birth and major perinatal outcomes among dichorionic-diamnionic twin pregnancies: A seven-year retrospective cohort study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavia. 2021;100(1):162–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13981.
26. Mitts MD, Belfort MA, Clark SL. The impact of indication for cesarean on blood loss. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024;232(5):478.e1–478.e7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.116.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Rosyuk EA, Pletnikova OV, Oshkokova YD, Mishchenko AE. Features of the Course of Pregnancy and Childbirth in Women of Different Age Groups. Ural Medical Journal. 2025;24(4):67–77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52420/umj.24.4.67. EDN: MKCRGD