Experience and analyses of results in open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
https://doi.org/10.25694/URMJ.2018.09.38
Abstract
Renal cancer takes the 10th place on incidence among malignant new growths, and on the level of an increase concedes only to a prostate cancer. Today surgical treatment remains by the single efficient method of treatment of the localized renal tumors. In recent years low-invasive surgical interventions at new growths of renal began to be applied more often. In this article experience of realization of 74 operations executed by laparoscopic and open access on the basis of USMU chair of urology in the urological department of MAI "City Clinical Hospital №40" during the 2013-2018 years is explained. The comparative analysis of partial nephrectomy depending on access is carried out. The analysis of 35 patients treatment is made.
About the Authors
M. A. Frank
ФГБОУ ВО УГМУ МЗ РФ
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. E. Sangharov
МАУ ГКБ № 40
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
R. S. Shamuratov
Федеральный научно-клинический центр Федерального медико-биологического агентства
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. I. Miroshnichenko
ФГБОУ ВО УГМУ МЗ РФ
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. O. Murzin
МАУ ГКБ № 40
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. M. Urev
МАУ ГКБ № 40
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
K. I. Kapustin
МАУ ГКБ № 40
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. G. Uss
МАУ ГКБ № 40
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. R. Gaitova
МАУ ГКБ № 40
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. V. Tonkov
МАУ ГКБ № 40
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
G. S. Nasibullina
ФГБОУ ВО УГМУ МЗ РФ
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Петрова Г.В.// Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2016 году. Московский научно-исследовательский онкологический институт имени П.А. Герцена □ филиал Федерального государственного бюджетного учреждения «Национальный медицинский исследовательский радиологический центр» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации Российский Центр информационных технологий и эпидемиологических исследований в области онкологии М: 2016г.: -236 с.
2. Ljungberg B., Albigest L., Bensalah K., Bex A., Giles R.H., Hora M. et al. EAU Guidelineson Renal Cell Carcinoma Copenhagen 2018, 175.
3. Nisen H., et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy in patients with T1 renal tumor: Comparative perioperative, functional and oncological outcome. Scand J Urol, 2015:1.
4. Springer, C., Hoda, M.R., Fajkovic, H., Pini, G., Mohammed, N., Fornara, P. et al. Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal tumours: evaluation of long-term oncological and functional outcomes in 340 patients. BJU Int. 2013;111: 288.
5. Zhuo L.,Ping W., Dan X.,Yang-Feng L., Hua-Feng P.Comparison between laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: Surgical, oncologic, and functional outcomes. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences Volume 29, Issue 11, November 2013, 628.
Review
For citations:
Frank MA, Sangharov AE, Shamuratov RS, Miroshnichenko VI, Murzin MO, Urev MM, Kapustin KI, Uss AG, Gaitova MR, Tonkov IV, Nasibullina GS. Experience and analyses of results in open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Ural Medical Journal. 2018;(9):129-132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25694/URMJ.2018.09.38
Views:
105
Email this article 