Diagnostically significant differences septic and aseptic instability of endoprosthesis components during arthroplasty of large joints

The purpose of the work is to analyze the results of laboratory, microbiological and instrumental studies to search for screening criteria for the difference between aseptic and septic instability of endoprosthesis components after knee and hip joint arthroplasty. The materials contained 146 cases of revision arthroplasty of the knee and hip joints, performed under the conditions of Federal State Budgetary Institution Federal Center of Traumatology, Orthopedics and endoprosthesis replacement of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Cheboksary) for a 3-year period, including cases of aseptic instability - 69, septic instability - 77. By methods for laboratory diagnosis were used to evaluate the blood levels of leukocytes, stab neutrophils, ESR, C - reactive protein (CRP), presepsin, procalcitonin, D-dimer, interleukin-6. Using ultrasound (ultrasonic) examination of the periprosthetic zone, the presence of fluid, granulation tissue in the joint cavity, altered lymph nodes was determined. Before the operation, the level of cytosis and cellular composition were determined in the synovial fluid; tissue bioptates, removed components of implants (after ULTRASONIC treatment) with sowing on the microflora were studied intraoperatively. Intraoperative tissue biopsies were used to make smears-prints on the glass, with gram staining, estimating the number of leukocytes and neutrophils in the field of vision. Results. Determination of indicators of ESR, presepsin and interleukin-6, the level of which goes beyond the generally recognized normal values in the presence of infection, can be recommended as a screening test in the diagnosis of the infectious nature of instability of the components of the endoprosthesis of large joints. The second stage of differential diagnosis of septic and aseptic instability can be the detection of lymphadenopathy. The third (final) stage of determining the infectious nature of instability is an invasive technique to determine the level of cytosis with the calculation of neutrophils in the synovial fluid.

септическая нестабильность, асептическая нестабильность, артропластика, СоЭ, пресепсин, интерлейкин-6, septic instability, aseptic instability, arthroplasty, ESR, presepsin, interleukin-6

1. Bozic K.J., Kurtz S.M., Lau E. et al. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. - 2009. - Vol. 91, № 1. - P.128 - 133.

2. Mayer-Wagner S1, Mayer W., Maegerlein S., Linke R., Jansson V., Müller PE. Use of 18F-FDG-PET in the diagnosis of endoprosthetic loosening of knee and hip implants. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010 Oct; 130(10): 1231 - 8.

3. Бажкова С.А. Современные принципы диагностики и антибактериальной терапии инфекции протезированных суставов (обзор литературы). Травматология и ортопедия России. 2011 - 3(61), с. 126 - 136.

4. Николаев Н.С., Николаева А.В., Пчелова Н.Н. Борисова Л.В. Комплексный подход к проблеме инфекционных осложнений после эндопротезирования крупных суставов. Вестник академии наук Молдовы. Медицина. 2017; 3(55): 341 - 347.

5. Николаев Н.С., Борисова Л.В., Пчелова Н.Н., Орлова А.В., Каралин А.Н. Практические рекомендации по диагностике имплант - ассоциированной инфекции при эндопротезировании крупных суставов в современных условиях. Медицинский альманах, 2016; 3(43): 40 - 5

6. Greidanus N.V.,Masri B.A., Garbus D.R.,Wilson S.D.,McAlinden M.G., Xu M., Duncan C.P., Use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level to diagnose infection before revision total knee arthroplasty. A prospective evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 1409 - 1416.

7. Bottner F., Wegner A., Winkelmann W., Beckr K., Erren M., Gotze C. Interleukin-6, proclcitonin and TNF - alpha: markers of peri-prosthetic infection following total joint replacemtnt. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 94 - 99.

8. Berbari E., Mabry T.,Tsaras G., Spangehl M., Erwin P.J., Hassan Murad M., et ai.Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92: 2102 - 2109.

9. Renz N.,Trampuz A. Pocet Guide to Diagnosis & Treatment of Periprosthetic joint infection.Version: 10.10.2015

10. Corona P., Gil F., Guerra E., Soldado F., Amat C., Flores X., et al. Percutaneous interface in dry-aspiration cases of chronic periprosthetic joint infection: a technigue for preoperative isolation of the infecting organism. Int Orthop. 2012; 36(6): 1281 - 1286.

11. Николаев Н.С., Драндров Р.Н., Галкина Т.Ю. Патент на изобретение № 2496423 «Способ исследования мягких тканей параартикулярной зоны в эндопротезировании тазобедренного сустава».