The features of reproductive anamnesis and mother’s medical activity who abandoned their children in maternity facilities

The leading reason of early social orphanage is the mother’s rejection from her newborn child directly in the maternity facilities. Taking into consideration this acute problem, the Russian State Universities and social organizations are actively trying to solve it only after the fact of abandonment of the newborn in maternity facilities. The aim of this study is the revelation of features of reproductive anamnesis and medical activity during pregnancy of future mothers that are going to abandon their newborn child. Materials and methods of the research. The primary material was formed using the method of copying data from the accounting form 96 "History of childbirth”. The total number of observation units was 1429 mothers. Results and discussion. The large amount of pregnancies, starting with third, were generally due to increase of amount of aborts at the request of women. The further increase in the number of pregnancies of mothers that are going to abandon their child is only due to the increase in the number of abortions at the request of women. In general, during 9 years of the research Their number can reach nine cases in one or three births. On average, less than a third of expectant mothers, who have abandoned their children, have been admitted to obstetricians-gynecologists for nine years of study in all three groups of territories. Conclusion. In 81,1% mothers that are going to abandon their child of Chelyabinsk region the rejection from child is a regular result due to the features of their reproductive behavior, full neglect to contraception and their own health that is indicated be their multiple pregnancies that end by abort operations. The traditional prophylactic work to prevent early social orphanage with modern society of mothers that are going to abandon their child is possible with 16,5% of pregnant women that registered timely in female consultation. With 69.7% of mothers the work to prevent abandonment of the newborn can be carried out only by the staff of the maternity hospital and in a short time-in the first 3-5 days from the date of birth.

матери-отказницы , раннее социальное сиротство, профилактика , медицинская активность , Mothers , early social orphanage , prophylactics , medical activity

1. Алиев, Н.Н. Теоретические основы взаимодействия структур общества в преодолении социального сиротства в современной России/ Н.Н. Алиев, А.А. Коренюк // Социальная политика и социальное партнёрство 2016; 11-12: 51-62.

2. Бармина, Т.В. Роль исследования отказа от материнства в решении проблем социального сиротства/ Т.В. Бармина, Е.В. Толкачева // Власть и управление на Востоке России 2016; 4: 122-127.

3. Braathen SH, Vergunst R, Mji G, Mannan H, Swartz L (2013) Understanding the local context for the application of global mental health: a rural South African experience. Int Health 5: 38-42.

4. Marais L, Sharp C, Pappin M, Rani K, Skinner D, et al. (2014) Community-based mental health support for orphans and vulnerable children in South Africa: A triangulation study. Vulnerable Child Youth Stud 9: 151-158.

5. Sharp C, Jardin C, Marais L, Boivin M (2015) Orphanhood by AIDS-Related Causes and Child Mental Health: A Developmental Psychopathology Approach. J HIV AIDS 1(3): doi http://dx.doi.org/10.16966/2380-5536.114

6. Рябова, В.В. Социологические аспекты профилактики социального сиротства /В.В. Рябова // Известия Иркутской государственной экономической академии (Байкальский государственный университет экономики и права) 2015; 6, 3: 34 -DOI : 10.17150/2072-0904.2015.6(3).34.

7. Федулова. А.Б. Институциональные ресурсы органов и социальных служб города Архангельска по проведению мер для предотвращения отказа матери от ребенка/ А.Б. Федулова, А.О. Юшманова// Человек. Общество. Инклюзия 2016; 3-1 (27): 24-31.

8. Doss, B.D. The transition to parenthood: impact on couples ’ romantic relationships/ B.D. Doss, G.K. Rhoades // Current Opinion in Psychology 2017; 13: 25-28. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.003

9. Каsedde S. They are not always a burden: Older people and child fostering in Uganda during the HIV epidemic/ S. Kasedde, A.M. Doyle, J.A. Seeley et al.// Social Science & Medicine 2014; 113(100): 161-168.

10. Lee, V.C. Orphans and Vulnerable Children in Kenya: Results From a Nationally Representative Population-Based Survey/ V.C. Lee, P. Muriithi, U. Gilbert-Nandra et al. //J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2014; 1. 66(1): 89-97.

11. Robertson L. Household-based cash transfer targeting strategies in Zimbabwe: Are we reaching the most vulnerable children?/ L. Robertson, P. Mushati, J.W. Eaton et al. //Social Science & Medicine 2012; 75: 2503-2508.

12. Ronsmans, C. Effect of parent’s death on child survival in rural Bangladesh: a cohort study/ C Ronsmans, M.E. Chowdhury, S.K. Dasgupta et al.//Lancet 2010; 375: 2024-2031.

13. Yamin A.E. Costs of Inaction on Maternal Mortality: Qualitative Evidence of the Impacts of Maternal Deaths on Living Children in Tanzania/A.E. Yamin, V.M. Boulanger, K.L. Falb et al. //Plos one/ 2013; 8(8): 1-6.

14. Пономарёва, Е.В. Девиантное материнство как фактор формирования образа матерей у детей/ Е. В. Пономарёва // Закономерности и традиции развития науки в современном обществе: сборник статей. Уфа: РИЦ БашГУ, 2013; 2: 241-252.

15. Фаррахов, А.З. Опыт медико-социальной помощи женщинам, намеревающимся отказаться от своего ребенка/ А.З. Фаррахов, Т.Б. Мороз, Р.С. Бакиров и др.//Вопросы современной педиатрии 2012; 11(3): 10-11.