Impact of some intraoperative factors on wound infection in cardiac surgery
https://doi.org/10.52420/2071-5943-2021-20-1-36-43
Abstract
Relevanc. Surgical Site Infection (SSI) after open heart surgery is a significant problem in clinical, social, and economic aspect which causes the need to identification of the preferred procedures for successful prevention of the SSI.
Objectives. To determine risk of the SSI in cardiac surgery depending on complexity of intervention, using of cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP) and use of both internal mammary arteries (IMA).
Methods. Prospective observations study from 2010 to 2019 in cardiac surgery department of the Ural Institute of Cardiology, where in total 4993 open heart surgery procedures were consecutively performed. All SSI cases were recorded up to 90 days after surgery. The analysis was performed to identify risk of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), bilateral IMA grafting and combined procedures on the risk of the postoperative wound infection.
Results. During the investigation period, total 220 cases of the SSI (4,5%) have been registered of the 4993 patients undergoing open heart surgery. It included 42 cases of deep sternal infection (0,9%) and 178 cases of superficial infection (3,6%). The main pathogen identified was Staphylococcus epidermidis (56,4%). During the hospital period, 151 cases (66,5%) of SSI have been detected, with the median time to detection of the complication 6 days. The relative mortality risk in deep sternal infection group was 4,4 times higher than in the group without SSI (HR 4,6, 95 % CI 1,5-13,9, p=0,003624). CABG increases the relative risk of SSI in compare with non-CABG procedures (OR 3,086169; 95%CI 1,281 – 7,437), while the complexity of the operation (combined versus isolated interventions) does not significantly increase the risk (OR 0.972283; 95% CI: 0.696 - 1.359). The incidence of SSI in the group of in situ BIMA grafting was 8.8%, significantly increasing the likelihood of the SSI in compare to those with SIMA (OR 2.167983, 95% CI 1.463 - 3.212; p =0,000057). CBP significantly increases the risk of postoperative wound infections (OR 1.523890, 95% CI 1.149 - 2.022, p = 0.001742).
Conclusions. Refusal of cardiopulmonary bypass, simultaneous procedures and bilateral coronary artery bypass does not allow completely to avoid postoperative wound infections. Nevertheless, the technical features of the preparations and use of grafts, including skeletonization, prevention of coagulation and the preference for sequential composite CABG, can reduce the risk associated with the type of the open heart surgery.
About the Author
A. V. StepinRussian Federation
Artem V. Stepin, PhD
Ekaterinburg
References
1. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia after median sternotomy: clinical utility of blood culture results in the identification of postoperative mediastinitis / Fowler V.G. Jr, Kaye K.S., Simel D.L. [et al.] // Crculation. – 2003. – Vol. 108. – P. 73 – 78.
2. Outcomes and Patency of Complex Configurations of Composite Grafts Using Bilateral Internal Thoracic Arteries / Chia-Hui Shih B., Chung S., Kim H. [et al.] // Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. – 2020. – Vol. 53, №2. – P. 64 - 72.
3. Инфекции в кардиохирургии / Чернявский А. М., Таркова А. Р., Рузматов Т. М. [и др]. // Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. – 2016. – №5. – С. 64-68.
4. El Oakley, R. M. Postoperative mediastinitis: classification and management / El Oakley R. M., Wright J. E. // Annals of Thoracic Surgery. – 1996. – Vol. 61. – P. 1030 – 1036.
5. Superficial and deep sternal wound infection after more than 9000 coronary artery bypss graft (CABG): incidence, risk factors and mortality / Salehi Omran A., Karimi A., Ahmadi S.H. [et al.] //BMC Infectious Disease. – 2007. – Vol. 7. - P. 112-117.
6. Center-Level Variation in Infection Rates After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting / Shahian D. M., Zhang M., Kommareddi M. [et al.]. // Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. – 2014. – Vol. 7, №2. – P. 567-573
7. Anonymous. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004// The American Journal of Infection Control. – 2004. – Vol. 32, №2. – P. 470-485.
8. Wang, F. D. Risk factors of deep sternal wound infections in coronary artery bypass graft surgery / Wang F. D., Chang C. H. // Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery. – 2000. – Vol. 41. – P. 709-713.
9. Superficial and deep sternal wound complications: incidence, risk factors and mortality / Ridderstolpe L., Gilla H., Granfeldtb H. [et al.] //European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. – 2001. – Vol. 20. – P. 1168 - 1175.
10. Mediastinitis and cardiac surgery: an updated risk factor analysis in 10,373 consecutive adult patients / Gummert J. F., Barten M. J., Hans C. [et al.] // The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon. – 2002. – Vol. 50. – P. 87-91.
11. Бокерия, Л. А. Инфекция в кардиохирургии / Бокерия Л. А., Белобородова Н. В. – М. : НЦССХ им. А. Н. Бакулева РАМН, 2007. – 582 с.
12. Эпидемиологическая и микробиологическая характеристика послеоперационного периода у пациентов старшего возраста в кардиохирургии / Габриэлян Н. И., Савостьянова О. А., Горская Е. М. [и др] //Эпидемиология и Вакцинопрофилактика. – 2015. – №5. – С. 51-56.
13. Epidemiology of deep sternal wound infection in cardiac surgery / Filsoufi F., Castillo J. G., Rahmanian P.B. et al. // Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. – 2009. –Vol. 23. – P. 488-494.
14. Sternal Healing after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using Bilateral Internal Thoracic Arteries: Assessment by Computed Tomography Scan / Shin Y. C., Kim S. H., Kim D. J. [et al.] // Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. – 2015. – Vol. 48. – P.33-39.
15. Chamberlain memorial paper. Sternal wound complications after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: early and late mortality, morbidity, and cost of care / Loop F. D., Lytle B. W., Cosgrove D. M. [et al.] // Annals of Thoracic Surgery. – 1990. – Vol. 49 – P. 179 – 187.
16. Галимзянов, Ф. В. Некоторые вопросы антибиотикопрофилактики и антибактериальной терапии у больных хирургической инфекцией : Учебное пособие для хирургов / Галимзянов Ф. В., Лосева И. П. – Екатеринбург : Издательство УГМУ, 2017. – 135 с.
17. Prevalence of 90-days postoperative wound infections after cardiac surgery / Jonkers D., Elenbaas T., Terporten P. [et al.] //Europan Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. – 2003. – Vol. 23. – P.97 - 102.
18. Tegnell, A. Coagulase-negative staphylococci and sternal infections after cardiac operation / Tegnell A., Aren C., Ohman L. // Annals of Thoracic Surgery. – 2000. – Vol. 69. – P. 1104 – 1109.
19. Граничная, Н. В. Фенотипическая характеристика биологических свойств коагулазонегативных стафилококков, выделенных в кардиохирургическом стационаре / Граничная Н. В., Зайцева Е. А., Бондарь В. Ю. // Альманах клинической медицины. – 2017. –Т. 45, №2. – С. 127-132.
20. Kunal, S. Mediastinitis in cardiac surgery: A review of the literature / Kunal S., Vishal K., Deepak K.S. // International Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Research. – 2012. – Vol. 1, №. 2. – P. 97–103.
21. Ariyaratnam, P Risk factors and mortality associated with deep sternal wound infections following coronary bypass surgery with or without concomitant procedures in a UK population: a basis for a new risk model? / Ariyaratnam P., Bland M., Loubani M. // Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. – 2010. – Vol. 11. – P. 543-546.
22. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery harvesting on superficial and deep sternal infection: The role of skeletonization / De Paulis R., de Notaris S., Scaffa R. [et al.] //Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. – 2005. –Vol. 129, №3. – P.536 - 543.
23. Принципы организации при операционной антибиотикопрофилактики в учреждениях здравоохранения. Федеральные клинические рекомендации / Асланов Б. И. [и др.] – М. : [б. и.], 2014, 42 с. – Url: http://nasci.ru/?id=3370 (ссылка активна на 28 октября 2020)/
24. Профилактика инфекций области хирургического вмешательства : Клинические рекомендации. / Брико Н. И. [и др]. – Н. Новгород : Изд-во «Ремедиум Приволжье», 2018. – 72 с.
25. Guideline fr Prevention of Surgical Se Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Practices Advisory Committee / Mangram A. J., Horan T. C., Pearson M. L. [et al.] // The American Journal of Infection Control. – 1999. – Vol. 27. – № 2. – P. 97-132.
26. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Antibacterial sutures for wound closure after surgery: a review of clinical and cost-effectiveness and guidelines for use [Internet]. 2014. Table A4, surgical wound classification. – Url: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK263230/table/T5/. Accessed March 13, 2021.
27. Garner, J. S. CDC guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections, 1985. Supersedes guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections published in 1982. (Originally published in November 1985). Revised // Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. – 1986. – Vol. 7, № 3. – P. 193-200.
28. Simmons, B. P. Guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections // The American Journal of Infection Control. – 1983. – Vol. 11, № 4. – P. 133-143.
Review
For citations:
Stepin AV. Impact of some intraoperative factors on wound infection in cardiac surgery. Ural Medical Journal. 2021;20(1):36-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52420/2071-5943-2021-20-1-36-43